Since the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT, there
has been much media, social, political, and religious attention focused on gun
control. I can’t count the number of
voices calling for stricter regulations and tighter controls. There are at
least an equal number who want to maintain the status quo. The rhetoric has been deafening.
What strikes me as odd is that we didn’t have similarly
boisterous outcries following Columbine, Gabrielle Giffords, or the Aurora
Theatre shootings. Perhaps that’s because there were so many children who were
innocent victims. I suppose the reasons
are unimportant, but I think the conversation is very important. I’m afraid the conversation won’t be addressing
the real problem. I think Porky Pine,
speaking to Pogo Possum captured it perfectly:
“We have met the enemy and he is us.”
French Literature professor and literary critic René
Girard made a profound discovery. While
looking for what made a truly great novel, he observed that conflict
relationships always seemed to include a third-party. This most often is an
object, a thing, and it is the source of the conflict. He suggests that all of our desires, what we
want, are derived from someone else. We
“borrow” them. He called this “mimetic
desire”. Mimesis, from which the word
‘mime’ is derived, is imitation, mimicry, or representation. This leads to mimetic rivalry: one party has
something (Girard calls it the ‘mediator’) that the other desires. It manifests itself in many ways. Perhaps the
easiest to see is ‘the desire to have what someone else has.’ Advertising seems to be oriented toward
convincing us that we really want to possess the newest product.
From here, it is a short jump to violence as a method of
acquiring the mediator. If you think
about novels you’ve read, you can probably already identify some examples of
this.
The last concept he identified is the ‘scapegoat
mechanism’. This, he holds, as foundational to sacrifice and human culture
itself. He sees religion as the development of a mechanism to combat mimetic
rivalry.
A few examples from the Bible:
- Cain kills Abel because God preferred Abel’s offering over that of Cain.
- Jacob tricks Isaac into giving him Esau’s birthright. Rachel helped out in this one, so we have conspiracy.
- Joseph is cast into a pit by his brothers because he is Jacob’s favorite son.
- The Apostles blame the Jews for Jesus’ crucifixion (Acts). This one is complicated: Mimetic rivalry is behind Jesus’ trial; the Apostles are scapegoating the Jews; in a theological view, Jesus is the scapegoat for humanity.
There are many, many more examples throughout the Bible.
With Girard's perspective in view, it would seem like violence is endemic to the human race. I think the question that remains is: Is there anything we can do to change this? I don't like being a pessimist, but I'm not hopeful. My lack of hope stems from a sense that we, as humans, don't spend a lot of time thinking on our motivations for the things we do. I'll not suggest that we give over too much to the reptilian brain we each possess, but it does seem like it at times. I know when I find myself getting angry, one of the last thoughts is "Why am I getting angry?" It probably ought to be one of the first thoughts. Maybe the first thought should be, "Is this how God would want me to behave?" Something about the second of the Great Commandments comes to mind.
What it’s really all about is our failure to live into
the Kingdom of God, to live into our full stature as Children of God. We keep forgetting or ignoring Jesus’
commandment to us: “Love one another as I have loved you.” It’s only what God has been after us
to do since the beginning. I wonder why
it is that we can’t seem to do it.
No comments:
Post a Comment